Home Articole Premiul APTR pentru analiza politica

Premiul APTR pentru analiza politica

2002
54
SHARE

Luni seara la Teatrul National, Asociatia Profesionistilor de Televiziune din Romania a decernat premiile sale in cea de-a 24 a gala de la infiintare.

Am avut bucuria sa primesc pentru “Punctul de intalnire” premierul APTR 2014 pentru emisiune de analiza politica. Sunt recunoscator unui juriu formati din seniori ai artelor audio-vizuale si ai culturii romanesti care pastreaza o traditie de elita prin APTR.

APTR 2014

http://www.antena3.ro/economic/media/jurnalistii-antena-3-premiati-de-aptr-276263.html

Un privilegiu pentru care multumesc telespectatorilor emisiunii, importanti si numerosi, colegilor din Antena 3 si celor care imi trimit zilnic mesaje de incurajare.

Antena 3 e deja o stare de spirit, dovada ca si alti colegi au primit premii la alte categorii : Alessandra Stoicescu, Adrian Ursu, Carmen Avram si echipa in premiera.

Va promit emisiuni frumoase, decente si cat se poate de valoroase in 2015.

 

54 COMMENTS

  1. De doi ani baun că Punctul de Întâlnire e cea mai bună emisiune pentru analiză iar tu Radu Tudor ai cele mai realiste analize care s-au și înfăptuit cu cel puțin 90% acuratețe.Ca telespectator Antena 3 mă bucur că această cerere mi-a fost materializată și sunt mândru de tine

  2. America is on a “Hot War Footing”:
    House Legislation Paves the Way for War with Russia?

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/america-is-on-a-hot-war-footing-house-legislation-paves-the-way-for-war-with-russia/5418035

    By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
    Global Research, December 05, 2014
    Region: Russia and FSU, USA
    Theme: Law and Justice, US NATO War Agenda
    In-depth Report: UKRAINE REPORT
    17.7K 691 89 22.1K

    War USA
    America is on a war footing. While, a World War Three Scenario has been on the drawing board of the Pentagon for more than ten years, military action against Russia is now contemplated at an “operational level”. Similarly, both the Senate and the House have introduced enabling legislation which provides legitimacy to the conduct of a war against Russia.

    We are not dealing with a “Cold War”. None of the safeguards of the Cold War era prevail.

    There has been a breakdown in East-West diplomacy coupled with extensive war propaganda. In turn the United Nations has turned a blind eye to extensive war crimes committed by the Western military alliance.

    The adoption of a major piece of legislation by the US House of Representatives on December 4th (H. Res. 758) would provide (pending a vote in the Senate) a de facto green light to the US president and commander in chief to initiate –without congressional approval– a process of military confrontation with Russia.

    Global security is at stake. This historic vote –which potentially could affect the lives of hundreds of millions of people Worldwide– has received virtually no media coverage. A total media blackout prevails.

    The World is at a dangerous crossroads. Moscow has responded to US-NATO threats. Its borders are threatened.

    On December 3, the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation announced the inauguration of a new military-political entity which would take over in the case of war.

    Russia is launching a new national defense facility, which is meant to monitor threats to national security in peacetime, but would take control of the entire country in case of war. (RT, December 3, 2014)

    Timeline of War Preparations

    In May 2014, the Russian Aggression Prevention Act (RAPA) was introduced in the US Senate (S 2277), calling for the militarization of Eastern Europe and the Baltic States and the stationing of US and NATO troops on Russia’s doorstep:

    S.2277 – Russian Aggression Prevention Act of 2014

    Directs the President to: (1) implement a plan for increasing U.S. and NATO support for the armed forces of Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia, and other NATO member-states; and (2) direct the U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO to seek consideration for permanently basing NATO forces in such countries.

    Directs the President to submit a plan to Congress for accelerating NATO and European missile defense efforts.

    While The S 2277 resolution was sent to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for review, its essential premises are already in the process of being implemented. In mid-July, NATO’s Europe commander General Philip Breedlove in consultation with the Pentagon and Britain’s Ministry of Defence, called for:

    “stockpiling a base in Poland with enough weapons, ammunition and other supplies to support a rapid deployment of thousands of troops against Russia”.(RT, July 24, 2014).

    NATO Summit Wales 2014According to General Breedlove, NATO needs “pre-positioned supplies, pre-positioned capabilities and a basing area ready to rapidly accept follow-on forces”:

    “He plans to recommend placing supplies — weapons, ammunition and ration packs — at the headquarters to enable a sudden influx of thousands of Nato troops” (Times, August 22, 2014, emphasis added)

    Breedlove’s “Blitzkrieg scenario” –which could potentially lead to military escalation– was reaffirmed at the September NATO Summit in Wales. A so-called NATO action plan directed against the Russian Federation was decided upon. The Wales Summit had given the “green light”.

    Barely a month later, in October, US-NATO military drills were held in the Baltic States. In early November, a second round of drills was held in both the Baltic States and Eastern Europe.

    As part of this broader endeavour, NATO’s Iron Sword 2014 military exercises –involving the participation of nine member countries of the Atlantic Alliance– were launched in Lithuania in early November:

    ”US tanks rolled in to Lithuania earlier this month is a show of force to Russia that it’s not welcome in the region.”

    The military exercises were explicitly directed against Russia. According to Moscow, they consisted in “increasing operation readiness” as well the transfer of NATO “military infrastructure to the Russian borders”.

    In response to NATO deployments on Russia’s borders, the Russian Federation also conducted in early November extensive war games in the sea of Barent. The Russian drills consisted in testing “its entire nuclear triad consisting of strategic bombers; submarines” and the “silo-based Topol-M intercontinental ballistic missile launched from Plesetsk in Arkhangelsk Oblast” on November 1st.

    The US House of Representatives H.Res. 758 Resolution

    On 18 November, a major resolution H. Res. 758 was introduced in the House of Representatives. Its main thrust consists in portraying Russia as an “Aggressor Nation”, which has invaded Ukraine and calling for military action directed against Russia:

    You can watch Rep. Kinzinger’s floor speech on the legislation

    H.RES.758 — Whereas upon entering office in 2009, President Barack Obama announced his intention to `reset’ relations with the Russian Federation, which was described by former United States Ambassador… (Introduced in House – IH)

    HRES 758 IH

    113th CONGRESS

    2d Session

    H. RES. 758

    Strongly condemning the actions of the Russian Federation, under President Vladimir Putin, which has carried out a policy of aggression against neighboring countries aimed at political and economic domination.

    (The full text of H. RES. 758 is contained in annex to this article)

    H. Res. 758 not only accuses Russia of having invaded Ukraine, it also invokes article 5 of the Washington Treaty, namely NATO’s doctrine of collective security.

    An attack on one member of the Atlantic alliance is an attack on all members of the Alliance.

    The underlying narrative is supported by a string of baseless accusations directed against the Russian Federation. It accuses Russia of having invaded Ukraine. It states without evidence that Russia was behind the downing of Malaysian Airlines MH17, it accuses Russia of military aggression.

    Ironically, it also accuses the Russian Federation of having imposed economic sanctions not only on Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova but also on several unnamed member states of the European Union. The resolution accuses the Russian Federation of having used “the supply of energy for political and economic coercion.”

    In essence, House Resolution 758 were it to become law would provide a de facto green light to the President of the United States to declare war on the Russian Federation, without the formal permission of the US Congress.

    In this regard, it could be interpreted as “mildly unconstitutional” in that it contravenes the substance of Article 1, Section 8, of the US Constitution which vests in the Congress “the Power to declare war…”

    The resolution urges the President of the United States in consultation with the US Congress to:

    “conduct a review of the force posture, readiness, and responsibilities of the United States Armed Forces and the forces of other members of NATO to determine if the contributions and actions of each is sufficient to meet the obligations of collective self defence under article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty and to specify the measures needed to remedy any deficiencies” .

    What the above paragraph suggests is that the US is contemplating the use of NATO’s collective security doctrine under article 5 with a views to triggering a process of military confrontation with the Russian Federation.

    The structure of military alliances is of crucial significance. Washington’s intent is to isolate Russia. Article 5 is a convenient mechanism imposed by the US on Western Europe. It forces NATO member states, most of which are members of the European Union, to act wage war on Washington’s behalf.

    Moreover, a referendum on Ukraine’s membership in NATO is contemplated. In case Ukraine becomes a member of NATO and/or redefines its security agreement with NATO, article 5 could be invoked as a justification to wage a NATO sponsored war on Russia.

    “Fast Legislation”

    Click image below to order Michel Chossudovsky’s book

    The speed at which this legislation was adopted is unusual in US Congressional history. originalHouse resolution 758 was introduced on November 18th, it was rushed off to the Foreign Affairs Committee and rushed back to the plenary of the House for debate and adoption.

    Two weeks (16 days) after it was first introduced by Rep. Kinzinger (Illinois) on November 18, it was adopted by 411-10 in an almost unanimous vote on the morning of December 4th.

    Members of Congress are puppets. Their vote is controlled by Washington’s lobby groups. For the defence contractors, Wall Street and the Texas oil giants, “war is good for business”.

    In the words of Dennis Kucinich in an open letter published on December 2:

    The resolution demands Russia to be isolated … In other words, ‘let’s get ready for war with Russia.’

    This is exactly the type of sabre rattling which led to the initiation and escalation of the Cold War. It is time we demanded that the US employ diplomacy, not more military expenditures, in the quest for international order.

    Media Blackout

    One would expect that this historic decision would has been the object of extensive news coverage.

    In fact what happened was a total news blackout.

    The nation’s media failed to provide coverage of the debate in House of Representatives and the adoption of H Res 758 on December 4.

    The mainstream media had been instructed not to cover the Congressional decision.

    Nobody dared to raise its dramatic implications. its impacts on “global security”. ”World War III is not front page news.”

    And without mainstream news concerning US-NATO war preparations, the broader public remains unaware of the importance of the Congressional decision. .

    In Annex to this article is the google news feed for H. Rep. 758 (7pm ET prior to the publication of this article). We suggest that readers check the news feed on online search engines as well as print media.

    Spread the word. Reverse the tide of war.

    Break the mainstream media blackout.

    Click to order Michel Chossudovsky’s Book directly from Global Research

    globalresearch.ca Towards a World War III Scenario

    Google News Feed 7pm ET, December 4, 2014. Last 24 hours.

    The Vote in the House of Representatives took place in the morning of December 4th, ET.

    last 24 hours (image icons removed)

    Search Results

    Ukraine’s Finance Minister: “Made in the USA”: Kiev Government …
    Center for Research on Globalization-4 hours ago
    Bearing that in mind, a bill known as H.Res.758 was recently introduced in the U.S. Congress. … The danger of this bill was highlighted by former U.S. Rep.
    Rep. Kinzinger Blasts Russia: ‘This Aggression Will Not Stand’

    Washington Free Beacon-7 hours ago
    Kinzinger is the sponsor of H. Res. 758, which formally condemns Russia for its military aggression and calls for the Russian Federation to remove its troops …
    Kinzinger resolution condemns Russian aggression
    The Rock River Times-1 hour ago
    Explore in depth (7 more articles)

    BBC News
    U.S. House Vote Could Lead to War with Russia, Warns Physicians …

    PR Newswire (press release)-59 minutes ago
    H. Res 758, “Strongly condemning the actions of the Russian Federation, under … countries aimed at political and economic domination,” is credited to Rep.
    the Nightly Whip: Wednesday, December 3, 2014

    Newsroom America-17 hours ago
    H.R. 5759 – “Executive Amnesty Prevention Act of 2014” (Rep. … H.Res. 758 – Strongly condemning the actions of the Russian Federation, under Vladimir Putin, …
    Stay up to date on results for H. Rep. 758

    Bill Text

    113th Congress (2013-2014)

    H.RES.758.IH

    H.RES.758 — Whereas upon entering office in 2009, President Barack Obama announced his intention to `reset’ relations with the Russian Federation, which was described by former United States Ambassador… (Introduced in House – IH)

    HRES 758 IH

    113th CONGRESS
    2d Session
    H. RES. 758
    Strongly condemning the actions of the Russian Federation, under President Vladimir Putin, which has carried out a policy of aggression against neighboring countries aimed at political and economic domination.
    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
    November 18, 2014
    Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs
    RESOLUTION
    Strongly condemning the actions of the Russian Federation, under President Vladimir Putin, which has carried out a policy of aggression against neighboring countries aimed at political and economic domination.
    Whereas upon entering office in 2009, President Barack Obama announced his intention to `reset’ relations with the Russian Federation, which was described by former United States Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul as a policy to `engage with Russia to seek agreement on common interests’, which included the negotiation of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) in which the United States agreed to major reductions in its nuclear forces;

    Whereas the Russian Federation has responded to this policy with openly anti-American rhetoric and actions and with armed aggression against United States allies and partner countries, including Ukraine and the Republic of Georgia;

    Whereas the Russian Federation has subjected Ukraine to a campaign of political, economic, and military aggression for the purpose of establishing its domination over the country and progressively erasing its independence;

    Whereas the Russian Federation’s invasion of, and military operations on, Ukrainian territory represent gross violations of Ukraine’s sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity and a violation of international law, including the Russian Federation’s obligations under the United Nations Charter;

    Whereas the Russian Federation’s forcible occupation and illegal annexation of Crimea and its continuing support for separatist and paramilitary forces in eastern Ukraine are violations of its obligations under the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, in which it pledged to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine and to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine;

    Whereas the Russian Federation has provided military equipment, training, and other assistance to separatist and paramilitary forces in eastern Ukraine that has resulted in over 4,000 civilian deaths, hundreds of thousands of civilian refugees, and widespread destruction;

    Whereas the Ukrainian military remains at a significant disadvantage compared to the armed forces of the Russian Federation in terms of size and technological sophistication;

    Whereas the United States strongly supports efforts to assist Ukraine to defend its territory and sovereignty against military aggression by the Russian Federation and by separatist forces;

    Whereas the terms of the ceasefire specified in the Minsk Protocol that was signed on September 5, 2014, by representatives of the Government of Ukraine, the Russian Federation, and the Russian-backed separatists in the eastern area of the Ukraine have been repeatedly violated by the Russian Federation and the separatist forces it supports;

    Whereas separatist forces in areas they controlled in eastern Ukraine prevented the holding of elections on May 25, 2014, for a new President of Ukraine and on October 26, 2014, for a new Rada, thereby preventing the people of eastern Ukraine from exercising their democratic right to select their candidates for office in free and fair elections;

    Whereas, on November 2, 2014, separatist forces in eastern Ukraine held fraudulent and illegal elections in areas they controlled for the supposed purpose of choosing leaders of the illegitimate local political entities they have declared;

    Whereas the Russian Federation has recognized the results of the illegal elections and continues to provide the military, political, and economic support without which the separatist forces could not continue to maintain their areas of control;

    Whereas the reestablishment of peace and security in Ukraine requires the full withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukrainian territory, the resumption of the government’s control over all of the country’s international borders, the disarming of the separatist and paramilitary forces in the east, an end to Russia’s use of its energy exports and trade barriers to apply economic and political pressure, and an end to Russian interference in Ukraine’s internal affairs;

    Whereas Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, a civilian airliner, was destroyed by a Russian-made missile provided by the Russian Federation to separatist forces in eastern Ukraine, resulting in the loss of 298 innocent lives;

    Whereas the Russian Federation has used and is continuing to use coercive economic measures, including the manipulation of energy prices and supplies, as well as trade restrictions, to place political and economic pressure on Ukraine;

    Whereas military forces of the Russian Federation and of the separatists it controls have repeatedly violated the terms of the ceasefire agreement announced on September 5, 2014;

    Whereas the Russian Federation invaded the Republic of Georgia in August 2008, continues to station military forces in the regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and is implementing measures intended to progressively integrate these regions into the Russian Federation;

    Whereas the Russian Federation continues to subject the Republic of Georgia to political and military intimidation, economic coercion, and other forms of aggression in an effort to establish its control of the country and to prevent Georgia from establishing closer relations with the European Union and the United States;

    Whereas the Russian Federation continues to station military forces in the Transniestria region of Moldova;

    Whereas the Russian Federation continues to provide support to the illegal separatist regime in the Transniestria region of Moldova;

    Whereas the Russian Federation continues to subject Moldova to political and military intimidation, economic coercion, and other forms of aggression in an effort to establish its control of the countries and to prevent efforts by Moldova to establish closer relations with the European Union and the United States;

    Whereas under the terms of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), a flight-test or deployment of any INF-banned weapon delivery vehicle by the Russian Federation constitutes a violation of the INF Treaty;

    Whereas, on July 29, 2014, the United States Department of State released its report on the Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments, as required by Section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act, for calendar year 2013, which found that, `[t]he United States has determined that the Russian Federation is in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty not to possess, produce, or flight-test a ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) with a range capability of 500 km to 5,500 km, or to possess or produce launchers of such missiles’;

    Whereas according to reports, the Government of the Russian Federation has repeatedly engaged in the infiltration of, and attacks on, computer networks of the United States Government, as well as individuals and private entities, for the purpose of illicitly acquiring information and disrupting operations, including by supporting Russian individuals and entities engaged in these actions;

    Whereas the political, military, and economic aggression against Ukraine and other countries by the Russian Federation underscores the enduring importance of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as the cornerstone of collective Euro-Atlantic defense;

    Whereas the United States reaffirms its obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty, especially Article 5 which states that `an armed attack against one or more’ of the treaty signatories `shall be considered an attack against them all’;

    Whereas the Russian Federation is continuing to use its supply of energy as a means of political and economic coercion against Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, and other European countries;

    Whereas the United States strongly supports energy diversification initiatives in Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, and other European countries to reduce the ability of the Russian Federation to use its supply of energy for political and economic coercion, including the development of domestic sources of energy, increased efficiency, and substituting Russian energy resources with imports from other countries;

    Whereas the Russian Federation continues to conduct an aggressive propaganda effort in Ukraine in which false information is used to subvert the authority of the legitimate national government, undermine stability, promote ethnic dissension, and incite violence;

    Whereas the Russian Federation has expanded the presence of its state-sponsored media in national languages across central and western Europe with the intent of using news and information to distort public opinion and obscure Russian political and economic influence in Europe;

    Whereas expanded efforts by United States international broadcasting across all media in the Russian and Ukrainian languages are needed to counter Russian propaganda and to provide the people of Ukraine and the surrounding regions with access to credible and balanced information;

    Whereas the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), Incorporated continue to represent a minority market share in Ukraine and other regional states with significant ethno-linguistic Russian populations who increasingly obtain their local and international news from Russian state-sponsored media outlets;

    Whereas the United States International Programming to Ukraine and Neighboring Regions Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-96) requires the Voice of America and RFE/RL, Incorporated to provide programming content to target populations in Ukraine and Moldova 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including at least 8 weekly hours of total original video and television content and 14 weekly hours of total audio content while expanding cooperation with local media outlets and deploying greater content through multimedia platforms and mobile devices; and

    Whereas Vladimir Putin has established an increasingly authoritarian regime in the Russian Federation through fraudulent elections, the persecution and jailing of political opponents, the elimination of independent media, the seizure of key sectors of the economy and enabling supporters to enrich themselves through widespread corruption, and implementing a strident propaganda campaign to justify Russian aggression against other countries and repression in Russia, among other actions: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved,

    That the House of Representatives–
    (1) strongly supports the efforts by President Poroshenko and the people of Ukraine to establish a lasting peace in their country that includes the full withdrawal of Russian forces from its territory, full control of its international borders, the disarming of separatist and paramilitary forces eastern Ukraine, the adoption of policies to reduce the ability of the Russian Federation to use energy exports and trade barriers as weapons to apply economic and political pressure, and an end to interference by the Russian Federation in the internal affairs of Ukraine;
    (2) affirms the right of Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, and all countries to exercise their sovereign rights within their internationally recognized borders free from outside intervention and to conduct their foreign policy in accordance with their determination of the best interests of their peoples;
    (3) condemns the continuing political, economic, and military aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova and the continuing violation of their sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity;
    (4) states that the military intervention by the Russian Federation in Ukraine–
    (A) is in breach of its obligations under the United Nations Charter;
    (B) is in violation of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances in which it pledged to respect the independence, sovereignty, and existing borders of Ukraine and to refrain from the threat of the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine; and
    (C) poses a threat to international peace and security;
    (5) calls on the Russian Federation to reverse its illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula, to end its support of the separatist forces in Crimea, and to remove its military forces from that region other than those operating in strict accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory of Ukraine;
    (6) calls on the President to cooperate with United States allies and partners in Europe and other countries around the world to refuse to recognize the illegal annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation;
    (7) calls on the Russian Federation to remove its military forces and military equipment from the territory of Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova, and to end its political, military, and economic support of separatist forces;
    (8) calls on the Russian Federation and the separatist forces it controls in Ukraine to end their violations of the ceasefire announced in Minsk on September 5, 2014;
    (9) calls on the President to cooperate with United States allies and partners in Europe and other countries around the world to impose visa bans, targeted asset freezes, sectoral sanctions, and other measures on the Russian Federation and its leadership with the goal of compelling it to end its violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, to remove its military forces and equipment from Ukrainian territory, and to end its support of separatist and paramilitary forces;
    (10) calls on the President to provide the Government of Ukraine with defense articles, services, and training required to effectively defend its territory and sovereignty;
    (11) calls on the President to provide the Government of Ukraine with appropriate intelligence and other relevant information to assist the Government of Ukraine to defend its territory and sovereignty;
    (12) calls on North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies and United States partners in Europe and other nations around the world to suspend all military cooperation with Russia, including prohibiting the sale to the Russian Government of lethal and non-lethal military equipment;
    (13) reaffirms the commitment of the United States to its obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty, especially Article 5, and calls on all Alliance member states to provide their full share of the resources needed to ensure their collective defense;
    (14) urges the President, in consultation with Congress, to conduct a review of the force posture, readiness, and responsibilities of United States Armed Forces and the forces of other members of NATO to determine if the contributions and actions of each are sufficient to meet the obligations of collective self-defense under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty and to specify the measures needed to remedy any deficiencies;
    (15) urges the President to hold the Russian Federation accountable for violations of its obligations under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty and to take action to bring the Russian Federation back into compliance with the Treaty;
    (16) urges the President to conduct a review of the utility of the INF Treaty in securing United States interests and the consequences for the United States of withdrawing from the Treaty if the Russian Federation does not return to compliance with its provisions;
    (17) calls on Ukraine, the European Union, and other countries in Europe to support energy diversification initiatives to reduce the ability of the Russian Federation to use its supply of energy as a means of applying political and economic pressure on other countries, including by promoting increased natural gas and other energy exports from the United States and other countries;
    (18) urges the President to expedite the United States Department of Energy’s approval of liquefied natural gas exports to Ukraine and other European countries;
    (19) calls on the President and the United States Department of State to develop a strategy for multilateral coordination to produce or otherwise procure and distribute news and information in the Russian language to countries with significant Russian-speaking populations which maximizes the use of existing platforms for content delivery such as the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), Incorporated, leverages indigenous public-private partnerships for content production, and seeks in-kind contributions from regional state governments;
    (20) calls on the United States Department of State to identify positions at key diplomatic posts in Europe to evaluate the political, economic, and cultural influence of Russia and Russian state-sponsored media and to coordinate with host governments on appropriate responses;
    (21) calls upon the Russian Federation to seek a mutually beneficial relationship with the United States that is based on respect for the independence and sovereignty of all countries and their right to freely determine their future, including their relationship with other nations and international organizations, without interference, intimidation, or coercion by other countries; and
    (22) calls for the reestablishment of a close and cooperative relationship between the people of the United States and the Russian people based on the shared pursuit of democracy, human rights, and peace among all nations.-

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-resolution/758

    To download the text of the Resolution Click: H Res 748

  3. Felicitari d-le Radu Tudor! Punctul de intilnire este o emisiune de exceptie, f. indragita de telespectatori si datorita personalitatii dvs. viguroase, dirze, cu dragoste de tara si de neam…Daca toti jurnalistii ar fi ca dvs. Romania noastra ar fi mai buna…

  4. Felicitări. Să moară de ciudă toți insolvenții – pardon, “oamenii de afaceri” – din presă/media.

  5. Ma bucur atunci cand munca voastra este apreciata si recunoscuta. Felicitari!!!

    Cat despre articolul lui Michel Chossudovsky (postat de Dl. Nicolae), acest domn Chossudovsky este atat de controversat si cu opinii cel putin ambigue in ceea ce priveste Rusia (el insusi fiind fiul unor emigranti rusi din Canada), incat eu personal m-as tine departe de concluziile acestui domn – nu pot nega unele lucruri mentionate in articol, insa articolul in ansamblu este mai degraba de un alarmism gratuit.

    Faptul ca US ia Rusia foarte in serios este un lucru de mult stiut si e foarte bine ca face acest lucru.

  6. Având în vedere că acesta este cel mai recent articol de pe blog (alternativa ar fi fost să comentez în cadrul celui legat de alimentație), scriu aici.

    Știre văzută semnalată pe pagina domnului Răzvan Dumitrescu și prezentată de dcNews: “Traian Berbeceanu, trimis în judecată” – http://www.dcnews.ro/traian-berbeceanu-trimis-in-judecata_461730.html

    Ultimul paragraf descrie perfect România: “Cazul este unic în justiția românească. Traian Berbeceanu este trimis în judecată pentru fapte incriminate de către persoane acuzate tocmai că au fabricat probe în acest dosar.”

    Țară de rahat…

  7. Domnule Radu Tudor, FELICITARI ! Este minunat sa fi rasplatit pentru munca depusa si
    va doresc multa putere, rezistenta si determinare in lupta pentru informarea corecta a Romanilor. Sunteti pe lista celor de care suntem mandri si va multumesc pentru asta. Tineti-o tot asa si la mai mare! 🙂

  8. Felicitari! Intr-adevar si eu consider ca analizele tale, atat de la Punctul de intalnire, cat si de la Ordinea zilei sunt cele mai aproape de realitate. Mult succes pe viitor! Iti doresc sa ramai cu o coloana vertebrala dreapta si sa faci in continuare emisiuni de calitate, asa cum ai promis! Multumesc pentru ca ne dai posibilitatea sa aflam informatii cat mai corecte si astfel sa putem evita sa fim o masa de manevra usoara!

  9. Nu e subiectivism, dar meriţi mult mai mult, în primul rînd pentru că ne suporţi comenteriile, multe aiurite fără sens aici pe blog, în aldoilea rînd, pentru ceea ce eşti şi pentru omul din tine: modul de exprimare şi poziţia ta ca om sunt doar două din multele exemple. Nu în ultimul rînd: Felicitări! pentru premiu, dar nici colegii de muncă nu sunt înlăturaţi de la multele felicitări şi spor la muncă, succes!

  10. incredibil! aveţi un stil de a vă autofaulta privind emisia pe site live A3, inconfundabil! nu pot să cred că tocmai voi de la A3 ne privaţi de ceea ce trebuie să ştim, de informaţii zilnice, de profesioniştii jurnalişti care muncesc pentru a arăta realităţile din orice perioadă!!!
    INCREDIBIL !!!

  11. Felicitari. Un premiu pe deplin meritat. Jurnalistii Antena 3 sunt, de departe, cei mai buni. O dovedeste chiar audienta.

  12. Felicitari Domnule Tudor si la mai multe!
    Un mic dar de la marcus cu aceasta ocazie 🙂 :

    Din Adancul Putz (a) Al Gandirii Ioahanniste

    Herr Und Frau President, ca doi bugetari romani care se respecta, in vacanta la un restaurant din Palm Beach US:

    Iohannis: – Auzi, draga, tu iti mai aduci aminte ce le-am zis romanilor mei in campania electorala?
    Frau Number Einz: – Pai, nu prea le-ai zis nimic!
    Herr president: – No, gut, atunci sa-mi aduci aminte dupa ce depun juramantul sa le mai zic o data!
    sa fiti iubit
    marcus

  13. “Va promit emisiuni frumoase, decente si cat se poate de valoroase in 2015.” Nu trebuie sa promiteti nimic. Daca decenta e atunci emisiunile frumoase si valoroase …e. Daca decenta e si rating…e. Iar pana acum A3 a dovedit ca are decenta ceea ce alte doua posturi concurente enerveaza prin agresivitate si… va sa zica ca nu le are! Succes si felicitari pentru premii!

  14. FELICITARI !
    si mult suscces in realizarea altor…..”emisiuni frumoase, decente si cat se Poate de valoroase în 2015″.

  15. Felicitari Domnule Tudor! Era si normal sa primiti acest premiu deoarece sunteti singurul realizator de emisiuni reale de analiza politica din Romania.

  16. Salut, Radu, sunt Cosmin Nicolescu, regizor de film documentar. Aseara la TNB am obtinut si eu Premiul pentru Film de Autor la Gala premiilor APTR, pentru documentarul Testamentul lui Brancusi. Este cel de-al 4-lea premiu APTR. Vroiam doar sa stii ca si eu sunt constantean si ca apreciez foarte mult calitatea emisiunilor tale. Cu siguranta ne vom intalni la un moment dat, aseara voi ati plecat mai repede:))

    Cosmin Nicolescu,
    http://www.cinethronix.ro

  17. felicitari pentru premiu si la mai multe emisiuni de calitate. dar si acum nu ma pot abtine sa nu intreb: dar dana grecu si marota ei pontista unde este?

  18. “Punctul de intalnire” o emisiune captivanta, pe parcursul careia, pentru noi telespectatorii, “timpul zboara” si se termina prea repede. Domnu Radu Tudor, felicitari din toata inima!

  19. Domnule Radu Tudor,acum că…deși cu o întârziere nedreptățită de 2 ani am rupt contractul cu FMI,cât mă va costa pe mie cetățean,cât voi mai da din buzunar,contribuabil,acum că s-a rupt contractul cu FMI.Concret,ce se întâmplă?
    Asta-i una la mână,doi…De ce ține Ponta ascuns noul guvern care va fi gata luni și nu este introdus opiniei publice/ă?

  20. Felicitari, asteptam noi comentarii cu profesionalism.
    Ma ingrjorasem un pic gandindu-ma ca, vom avea un Ponta La Cotroceni, un PDL_PMP in opozitie ,cu un demis- demis de tot, va fi liniste in tara si …dvs. nu mai aveti ce critica/ comenta.
    Acum m-am “”linistit”” !

  21. Domnule Radu Tudor,

    Fără doar și poate meritele sunt, deopotrivă, atât ale realizatorului cât și ale invitaților, a calității invitaților. Cei, poate, 100-150 de invitați sunt, desigur, și niște nume, au avut și ce transmite așa că toată lumea, lumea aceea a moderaților de care tot vorbesc eu mereu și nu aceea a ultrașilor lobotomați care nu-și doresc decât răzbunare și sânge pe pereți, s-a declarat mulțumită urmare a ceea ce au urmărit.
    Mi-aș dori foarte mult , dar cred că așa ceva nu se poate, să văd și lista invitaților pentru că ceea ce am spus, am spus-o din…. amintiri. Un amănunt deloc de neglijat, și la care ar trebui să reflectați, este că nu-i veți găsi prezenți in acest ultim an niciun îngălat, nici un gargaragiu, nici pe alde Iohannis , nici pe, antonescu, ceea ce spune mult.
    Felicitări, deci, și din partea mea!

  22. Oameni din întreaga lume consideră că instituţiile subordonate guvernului sunt cele mai corupte. Există vreun guvern incoruptibil?

    Barometrul global al corupţiei pe anul 2013, publicat de Transparency International, a arătat că majoritatea oamenilor consideră că primele cinci cele mai corupte entităţi sunt: partidele politice, poliţia, funcţionarii publici, parlamentul şi justiţia.

    Cele 6 motive din cauza carora exista coruptie si care este solutia.
    http://www.jw.org/ro/publicatii/reviste/wp20150101/guvern-incoruptibil/

    • Mi-au placut aceste doua fraze:
      Dacă societatea umană este coruptă, orice guvern care face parte din ea este, în mod inevitabil, corupt.
      Înţelegem, aşadar, că un guvern incoruptibil trebuie să provină din afara societăţii umane.

      Cu alte cuvinte solutia unui guvern si institutii fara coruptie sau coruptie scazuta ar fi: OAMENI FARA DORINTE DE IMBOGATIRE, altruisti multumiti cu necesitatile zilnice.

  23. Deşi nu de puţine ori am avut păreri şi poziţii diferite faţă de unele evenimente sau subiecte, vă felicit, d-le Tudor, pentru diploma obţinută datorită prestaţiilor de excepţie pe care le aveţi. Am, totuşi, un regret: chiar dacă mulţi dintre noi am susţinut candidatura d-lui profesor Atanasiu, dv. chiar sugerându-i asta cu ocazia unei invitaţii în emisiunea dv., nu s-a reuşit aceasta. Oare să nu-l fi susţinut partidul, sau domnia sa n-a vrut să participe?! Alta ar fi fost situaţia cu un asemenea candidat din partea social-democraţilor. În fine, asta e!
    P.S.: D-le Tudor, a câştigat ceva vreun realizator de la vreun post de televiziune căruia (căreia) îi “pute” Antena 3, şi pe ce temă?! Încă o dată, sincere felicitări!

      • Am înţeles. Consideraţi că Victor Ponta a fost un candidat incompetent şi comod. Atunci, de ce l-aţi susţinut, atât dv., cât şi aproape toţi colegii dv.?! Pentru tinereţea sa?! Până şi Iliescu-KGB/Viaţa noastră unde e?! l-a caracterizat ca pe un candidat necopt, un cârlan. Oare nu mai putea aştepta?! E clar că infatuarea lui Victor Ponta îi va aduce sfârşitul, la fel ca şi a mentorului său, Adrian Năstase a cărui infatuare, totuşi, se baza pe multă ştiinţă de carte şi cultură.

  24. Domnule Radu Tudor va felicit pentru premiul obtinut.
    Am sa va prezint un caz,motiv pentru care v-am trimis un email pe care va rog sa-l verificati si sa-mi dati un raspuns.
    Va multumesc!

  25. Felicitari! Este un premiu muncit si pe deplin meritat. Punctul de intalnire este o emisiune unica! Este doar o mica rasplata pentru munca depusa si va asigur si de recunostinta noastra a telespectatorilor dvs!
    MUltumesc Radu Tudor !

  26. Domnule Tudor,

    Chiar daca in ultima vreme nu am fost de acord cu Dumneavoastra, va urmaresc de mult timp activitatea foarte intensa si hotarata, asa incat nu am cum sa nu apreciez acest premiu pe care consider ca il meritati si va felicit pentru el.

    Cu stima,
    Corneliu Babiuc

Leave a Reply