Home Opinion FROM RUSSIA, WITH COLD

FROM RUSSIA, WITH COLD

21467
18
SHARE

Judging from the way the Syrian crisis unfolds, and against the background of hundred of immigrants arriving in Europe, I have to admit worrisomely that Russia succeeded in her game.  The plan Moscow drafted stemmed out from the rational actors in the Russian administration which rang the bell on the impact of the economic sanctions imposed by the Euro-atlantic community after the annexation of Crimea: Russia’s economy is falling down.

The costs of invading Ukraine, annexing Crimea and killing 300 innocent people from a commercial airplaned proved to be a stiff one: rampant depreciation of the rubla, economic growth reaching 0, decreased budgetary allowance for the military-industrial complex (otherwise revitalized in the last years in order to be able to run for the status of big power, position which Russia lost 25 years ago). Adding the decrease of the oil price to this picture, Russia was confronted with an unprecedented situation: the doors of the West were closing, the danger of an economic collapse and the perspective of stopping its military strengthening were clear and closer day by day. A horror scenario for Putin, which solemnly promised its citizen he will bring back the glory of the USSR.

Because his background is one of a KGB officer, and this is what he will remain his all life, the solution must come from the laboratories of the secret services Felix Djerdjinsky founded. The flow of hundreds of thousands of immigrants pouring into Europe gave the EU such a headache that the fear of having another one of two million Muslims in a largely Christian continent generated a crisis. This crisis was big and badly managed by an out of shape European Commission and a Germany which behaved in a hesitant, not to say questioning, manner. The statement of chancellor Merkel that Germany was able to receive a million refugees – and not being able to be up to his self assumed job – droved mad some European states transited by the refugees. These people passed through Greece, the Republic of Macedonia, Serbia, Hungary, desperately hoping to reach the welcoming Germany. Which proved tolerant in the popular reaction, but inconceivably foggy in terms of political and administrative action. The promise Germany broke generated mandatory quotas for the EU member states. It also brought negative response in many countries, with direct political effects on the governments.

For Russia, this European crisis very clumsy managed was an opportunity. Desperate voices stressed, and they were right, the need for an intervention in Syria in order to create the foundation of the return of the refugees in a pacified country. The four million refugees, plus the Lybians, Yemenys, Iraqis, Afghans and others were hunting like ghosts the dream of prosperity and tranquility of the EU leaders. And since Syria cannot be pacified without Russia, because Bashar al Assad is Moscow’s man as was his father from whom he inherited the leadership position, here we have the proposals: let’s invite Putin in the West, talk to him, think about reducing or even dropping the economic sanctions. So said, so done. Scared and inefficient Western leaders were stepping on the red footsteps the Kremlin garrison left on the ground. The issue of the terrorist threat of ISIL was the perfect excuse: let’s collaborate against terrorism, let’s liberate Syria of the beheaders. And afterwards we will see what we will do about Bashar al Assad, the dictator which killed many people than ISIL did. The Moscow man has 400.000 deaths on his conscience.

In this in pot which fear, profound political turbulence and powerful emotions melt, the worrying perspective of the invasion of millions of immigrants, US and Europe gave in. Let Putin speak, let’s talk to him. Crimes are forgotten, invasion of Ukraine is put aside, images with people killed in the crash of Malaysian Airlines are turned against the walls. In the same of a stability pretty difficult to get in the near future in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East, I have seen Vladimir Putin smiling. He did so in Washington with Barack Obama, in Paris with Francois Hollande and Angela Merkel. It was all the old KGB officer needed. He pushed more like an experienced Eastern bluffer: airstrikes against the Syrians opposing to Assad (even fired from the Caspian Sea, 1500 km away), thousands of troops sent in Syria, all this in order to have Russia’s message heard loud and clear. It is a message of a big power, able to have in the coming days other targets. If other crises will generate the same weak reaction from the EU and US side.

The strange game Merkel’s Germany did decisively contributed to this rebranding of Putin as a leader the West can do business with. Obama helped to strengthen this mistake, as he did with the Arab spring. Germany brought back the blamable Russia at the table out of ignorance or out of complicity? Difficult to say this with precision now. But it is sure that the economic downfall of Russia under the Western sanctions meant the lost of a huge market for the German industry, a branch selling in Russia merchandise of some tens of billions in Putin’s homeland. This would have been a way too powerful strike after Germany managed to pass through the Caudian Forks of the economic crisis. German companies pressured the politicians to do something. Moscow met their interest with the plan. Great minds think alike.

Following this immense crisis of the refugees, of Russia’s come back as an important actor, of recognizing the fact that Syria cannot be settled without those which controlled it in the las 50 years, we have the following conclusions:
·    Russia leaves the embarrassing position after the annexation of Crimea, becomes de nouveau a political and military actor, a partner for words and deeds
·    The Ukraine crisis, judged by the Europeans “most serious situation after the end of the Cold war” falls to a secondary tier
·    Yesterday humiliated and ashamed, Russia comes back with troops, planes and heavy weaponry in the Middle East, in a round of applause of the Syrian and Iranian regimes. Anyone can figure the long term consequences.
·    From the position of the smallest doll in the matrioska system – Stalin being the biggest – Putin reappears as essential for peace
·    The same Putin says, riotous, as nobody did since the end of the Cold War,  in a CBS interview, that the territory of the former USSR is a territory of Russia’s influence and control. The lost of the Baltic States was the sharp pain which led to the violent reaction in Georgia, Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova. Former USSR states do not have the liberty to chose their own path, they are condemned to remain into the Russian sphere of influence, under the permanent threat of a military intervention
·    With the simultaneous participation of the two open military conflicts – Urkaine and Syria – whti the launching of missiles from the Caspian Sea right into the Middle East, Russia becomes again USSR, as it was during the Cold War.
·    Did I say Cold War? Well, on the 25th anniversary of its end, the Cold War is alive again. We all must be aware of this.

Radu Tudor is a Romanian defense analyst for TV station Antena 3 and Jane’s Defence Weekly Correspondent in Romania

18 COMMENTS

  1. Back to square one, I agree. Still, Putin is no Stalin as proven by his rushed intervention in the Middle Eastern maze. Stalin would have waited to be asked on bended knee before firing one shot, would have had Obama fly to Malta (orany other fated island) with Cameron in tow and the duo Merkel-Hollande swimming their way to the meeting before giving his consent to a possible joint venture. I’m no specialist, of course, and the situation is ghastly wherever from you look at it but it all feels like an attempt at extortion on behalf of Russia and I don’t know if the injection of money and ressources Putin tries to get from the allies can balance the huge deficit brought by his fighting on two fronts. As for restoring Russia’s prestige it’s a no go. Nobody loves a blackmailer nor admires a paid thug. I think it’s time for Russia to bring in another Gorby if they want to siphon money and love from their counterpart.
    That said I enjoyed your analysis, your clarity of vision is much needed in these confused times.

    • RT: “The statement of chancellor Merkel that Germany was able to receive a million refugees – and not being able to be up to his self assumed job – droved mad some European states transited by the refugees.”

      Poate ca Merkel lucreaza sub influenta unor bauturi sau dosare aflate pe undeva. Poate in Rusia, poate in alta parte…
      Stim cat de acaparatoare e Rusia…dar si astialalti sunt dezastre…le pun totul la fileu la rusi.

      Iar cand Obama a vrut sa intervina in Siria in septembrie 2013 congresul republican a votat si a zis NO.

      • Depinde ce fel de dictatură. Democraţia este o păcăleală. Este de fapt tot o dictatură a unui clan de tîlhari împotriva unei naţiuni.

    • Felicitari pentru emisiunile Punctul de Intalnire. Foarte bine structurate si realizate. Jurnalisti valorosi la a3.

  2. Traducerea google m-a convins că e superficial articolul pentru a nu intra lumea în panică. Dacă intri pe Aljazera english nu sînt date toate întîmplările de la faţa locului. Dacă intri pe RT se dau absolut toate acţiunile inregistrate le faţa locului şi dacă ceri părerea unora sau altora, mai toate sînt pro sau contra. În concluzie: înregistrările RT şi evaziv Aljazera english poţi să-ţi faci o idee reală. Pînă şi despre vremea care s-a răcit brusc şi cu cîteva zile înainte de sezon este analizată pe multe ţări.

  3. Buna analiza, facuta de un excelent analist politic si militar dintr-o tara UE si NATO.
    Am notat cateva greseli minore de text, pe care poate doresti sa le revizuiesti Radu, pentru ca pot dezorienta in oarecare masura:
    -in paragraful 3, “the promise Germany broke” este corect
    -in paragraful 4 “the 4 million refugees” este corect
    -in paragraful 5 “in this pot in which” este corect
    -in ultimul paragraf, primul subpunct, nu stiu daca este folosita intentionat formula “de nuveau” din franceza, sau e o traducere automata.
    Sper ca aceste mici corecturi sa iti fie de ajutor.

  4. dupa aceasta lectura cu efect de dus rece (from russia a cold shower, how’bout that????) apar cateva framantari:
    1. avem vreun lider care se intreaba cu echipa sa ce are romania de facut in aceste vremuri?
    2. declaratia lui wesley clark cum ca nato nu poate apara romania a trecut neobservata. in locul premierului, i-as zice 2 sa nu se vada. si l-as si download din pozitia de consilier al pm. este inacceptabil asa ceva.

  5. I have a german friend that says they call Merkel “the teflon lady” because nothing gets stuck on her. She seems incapable to have a firm opinion about anything. She is “let’s discuss, think about this”. She is incapable of taking a decision until the shit hits the fan. And even then, it seems like she did not even think about possible (obvious) consequences.

    • Adica are obrazul gros si de ars ne ardem noi astia care nu suntem coated with teflon.

  6. marefanantena, pentru acest comentariu penal, cu toate urmele pe care le-ai lasat dpdv informatic, te-ai ales cu o plingere si un dosar. Indivizi mizerabili ca tine, care traiesc din ura si minciuna, trebuie sa plateasca.

  7. Am si eu o intrebare poate cineva mai initiat poate sa imi explice:daca Rusia e rea si face o gramada de victime de ce ar fi USA mai buna?!Din cate imi aduc aminte cam fiecare conflict armat in lumea asta de State a fost provocat.S-au dus in Irak pt arme chimice ,au destabilizat lumea araba lasand un vid de putere iar dupa aceea stim cu toti ce a urmat.Ne baga pe gat tot felul de legi ce ingradesc libertatea in numele democratiei…Iar in privinta victimelor facute de State nu vb nimeni.De ce Rusia e rea si nu trebuie aprijinita iar USA e buna si data drept exemplu de urmat?!Imi cer scuze de intrebare poate explica cineva si pt un noob ca mine.

  8. Judecand dupa logica amintita in articol, si anume ca Putin a fost KGB si va ramane toata viata un KGB, ce parere aveti de afirmatia ” George H. W. Bush Sr. a fost CIA si pt asta va ramane toata viata un CIA? (Va amintesc ca nu a fost doar Director CIA ci la fel ca si Putin, a avut si munca operativa).

Leave a Reply